Green Party representatives in Bath have reiterated their objections to a dedicated bicycle path planned for Royal Victoria Park. Their primary concern is that even with proposed enhancements like additional lighting, the route will continue to be viewed as "socially unsafe," especially by women and children.
This cycle path is a key component of the Bath Walking, Wheeling and Cycling Links program, which aims to improve connectivity between the city center and the Upper Weston suburbs. The route, designed to run alongside the park's ring road, initially faced opposition from the Green Party in December 2024 due to its unlit and isolated nature. Following a public consultation, the Bath and North East Somerset Council introduced revised plans that include eco-sensitive heritage lighting, resurfaced footpaths, and physical barriers to separate the cycle lane. However, Green Party councillors Saskia Heijltjes and Joanna Wright maintain their opposition, emphasizing the importance of socially safe, non-secluded routes for encouraging cycling. Their position is supported by an academic study suggesting that improved lighting does not necessarily reduce the perception of unsafety. Despite the Green Party's concerns, the Liberal Democrat-controlled council is expected to proceed with the project, highlighting a broader debate on local active travel initiatives and varying political party approaches to such developments.
The Greens' stance has drawn criticism, with journalist James Ball arguing that basing infrastructure decisions solely on perceived unsafety, rather than actual risk, could impede progress. Conversely, gender equality campaigner Susannah Walker has defended the Greens, pointing out that many women and girls experience routes like this as unsafe after dark, even if objectively low-risk. This highlights a complex interplay between objective safety measures and subjective feelings of security, especially for vulnerable groups. The broader context shows that while the Green Party's national manifesto supports significant investment in cycling infrastructure, local implementation can face nuanced challenges and diverse perspectives on what constitutes a truly inclusive and safe environment for all users.
The ongoing discussion surrounding the Royal Victoria Park cycle lane reflects a vital dialogue about urban planning, public safety, and accessibility. It underscores the importance of considering diverse community perspectives in infrastructure development, particularly those of groups who may feel vulnerable. Moving forward, a balanced approach that combines robust safety features with a deep understanding of public perception and lived experiences will be essential for creating truly effective and equitable active travel networks that benefit everyone.