Square Enix's latest release, "Dragon Quest VII: Reimagined," has garnered a wide range of critical opinions following its February 2026 launch. This updated version of the classic JRPG aims to modernize the experience with improved visuals and pacing, attracting both long-time fans and newcomers. Reviews reflect a general appreciation for its efforts to streamline the extensive adventure, though some critics debate whether these alterations come at the cost of the original's beloved challenge and depth.
Detailed Breakdown of Critical Responses to 'Dragon Quest VII: Reimagined'
In February 2026, Square Enix unveiled "Dragon Quest VII: Reimagined," an ambitious overhaul of a classic JRPG. The game has sparked considerable discussion among critics and players alike regarding its enhancements and their impact on the overall experience. Our own publication lauded it with a 9/10, proclaiming it the most enjoyable iteration yet, particularly for enthusiasts of high-quality, traditional JRPGs. However, the broader critical landscape offers a more nuanced view.
Several gaming outlets have weighed in, presenting a diverse spectrum of scores and observations. RPG Site, for instance, awarded a 7/10, acknowledging that the reimagined version retains the core essence of "Dragon Quest VII" but suggests that the process of streamlining has 'sanded off' some of the edges that contributed to player discovery and friction. They question if speeding up the adventure truly constitutes an improvement over its predecessor.
Similarly, IGN, also giving a 7/10, pointed out that while the game successfully delivers a quicker-paced experience for the 26-year-old classic, it might have gone too far in simplifying certain aspects. This, they argue, potentially diminishes the challenge and the sense of exploration for veteran players, despite retaining its signature charm.
Vooks offered a highly positive assessment with a 4.5/5 rating, highlighting how "Dragon Quest VII: Reimagined" breathes new life into an old favorite through a loving renovation. They praised the refreshed visual style and various additions and tweaks that make the story accessible to a new generation of gamers.
Nintendo World Report's 7.5/10 review described the game as a beautifully designed turn-based RPG that is more approachable than the 2016 3DS remake. However, they noted that it might not fully satisfy fans of earlier versions. While acknowledging no major flaws, they felt it didn't quite achieve the same level of satisfaction as more recent HD-2D titles or "Dragon Quest XI."
CGM, with an 8.5/10, highlighted that "Dragon Quest VII: Reimagined" successfully addresses some of the slower elements of the long-running series. They praised its next-gen visual upgrade and pacing, which aligns better with the expectations of contemporary JRPG enthusiasts.
Finally, RPG Fan bestowed an impressive 95/100, asserting that this reimagined version solidifies "Dragon Quest VII's" status as one of the series' finest entries. They commended its ability to smooth out rough edges, maintain narrative momentum, and present a combat system and aesthetic that represent the pinnacle of the series.
As the game becomes available on Switch and Switch 2, and with a demo already circulated, players now have the opportunity to form their own conclusions. The critical consensus suggests a well-executed reimagining that skillfully balances modernization with the preservation of its classic roots, though opinions diverge on the extent to which these changes enhance or alter the original masterpiece.
This release underscores the ongoing challenge and art of remaking beloved classics. Striking the right balance between honoring the original and innovating for a contemporary audience is a delicate act. While "Dragon Quest VII: Reimagined" has largely succeeded in modernizing its appeal, the varied reactions remind us that 'improvement' is often subjective, especially when dealing with nostalgic titles. It prompts a reflection on what truly defines a successful remake: is it fidelity to the past, bold new directions, or a harmonious blend of both?