In a recent social media post, former President Donald Trump voiced strong disapproval of Bad Bunny's Super Bowl halftime performance, calling it "absolutely terrible" and "disgusting." This reaction comes amidst Bad Bunny's ongoing advocacy against the former administration's immigration policies, which the artist has frequently addressed in his public appearances and performances. The contrasting viewpoints underscore a broader cultural and political divide, where artistic expression meets critical political commentary.
Former President Slams Super Bowl Halftime Show
On February 8, 2026, following the Super Bowl LX Halftime Show, former President Donald Trump took to Truth Social to lambast Bad Bunny's performance. He stated the show was "one of the worst, EVER!" and an "affront to the Greatness of America," claiming it failed to represent national standards of success, creativity, or excellence. Trump further criticized the performance by saying, "Nobody understands a word this guy is saying, and the dancing is disgusting, especially for young children that are watching from throughout the U.S.A., and all over the World."
His comments starkly contrasted with the message of love conveyed by Bad Bunny at the conclusion of his performance, where the artist declared, "The only thing more powerful than hate is love." Bad Bunny's set was a vibrant celebration of his Puerto Rican heritage, incorporating elements from his hometown community, and throughout the show, he wove a narrative of love. This criticism from Trump is not new, as he has been vocal about his displeasure with Bad Bunny since the artist was announced as the Super Bowl headliner. Bad Bunny has openly criticized Trump's administration's aggressive stance on immigration enforcement, notably slamming ICE at the 2026 Grammys during his acceptance speech and opting out of U.S. tour dates due to concerns about potential ICE raids at his concerts. The Super Bowl LX, featuring a match between the Seattle Seahawks and the New England Patriots at Levi's Stadium in Santa Clara, California, became a platform not just for sports, but also for significant cultural and political statements.
The incident highlights the intensifying intersection of pop culture and politics, particularly when prominent figures use their platforms to express divisive views. It prompts reflection on the role of artists in social discourse and the influence of political leaders on public opinion regarding cultural events. This ongoing dialogue emphasizes the power of both performance and political rhetoric to shape national conversations.